Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Soapbox

A politics and policy blog

open menu close menu

Soapbox

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Topics
    • Topics
    • Policy Analysis
    • Dentons 50
    • Federal Government Affairs
    • Local Government Solutions
    • Elections
    • Health Care Policies
  • States
    • States
    • Colorado
    • Georgia
    • Hawai`i
    • Iowa
    • Pennsylvania
  • Guides and Resources
    • Guides and Resources
    • Trump Administration Tracker
    • 119th Congress Tracker

Ohio Attorney General petitions for writ of mandamus to stop opioid trials

By Bill McCollum, Thurbert Baker, Samuel Olens, and Daniel C. Gibb
October 8, 2019
  • State Attorneys General
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

The US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio is the home of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) aggregating more than 2,000 lawsuits from across the country in which state political subdivision plaintiffs have sued manufacturers, distributors and others they claim responsible for the nation’s opioid epidemic. The court has scheduled a consolidated seven-week bellwether trial for two of those subdivisions (Ohio’s Cuyahoga and Summit Counties) seeking $8 billion, to begin on October 21, 2019. On August 30, 2019, in the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the Attorney General of Ohio filed a petition for writ of mandamus on behalf of the State of Ohio. The petition states that if the consolidated trial proceeds on the theories pleaded in the complaints, it will include claims that belong to the State of Ohio and presents the following question:

Should a writ of mandamus issue to stop or delay the trial in order to protect Ohio’s sovereign right to litigate on behalf of its citizens as parens patriae?

In 2017, the Ohio Attorney General brought a civil action in a state court against several opioid manufacturers. In the petition the Ohio AG asserts that (i) the writ of mandamus is necessary to preclude a US district court from trying non-justiciable claims in a trial which, if unchecked, would cripple the federal dual sovereignty structure of the US; and (ii) only a state AG has parens patriae standing to prosecute claims vindicating generalized harm to a state’s inhabitants and that political subdivisions do not have parens patriae standing. The petition argues that the trial would fragment the State’s claims, pose a high risk of inconsistent verdicts, result in duplicative or overlapping damages and misallocate funds in the state. The AG further asserts that the counties advance claims that belong to the State in an effort to commandeer moneys that rightfully should be distributed across the state by Ohio.

Thirteen other states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief in support of the petition. At this writing, no hearing on the petition has been scheduled.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Bill McCollum

About Bill McCollum

Former Florida Attorney General and Congressman Bill McCollum Co-Chairs Dentons' US State Attorney General Practice. His practice focuses on corporate compliance and investigations; complex state legal, regulatory and legislative matters; state anti-trust law enforcement; multi-state investigations and litigation; public policy; and advising and assisting companies with disruptive new technologies. He has represented and consulted for companies from a variety of industries with manufacturing and other business interests in Asia, Europe, the Middle East and Latin America.

All posts Full bio

Thurbert Baker

About Thurbert Baker

Attorney General Thurbert Baker co-leads Dentons' US State Attorney General practice and serves on the US Board. His practice focuses on corporate compliance and investigations, complex state legal and legislative matters, public policy and regulatory affairs, multi-state litigation, public sector procurements and regulatory matters.

All posts Full bio

Samuel Olens

About Samuel Olens

Samuel S. Olens is a partner in Dentons' Public Policy practice and is a member of the firm's State Attorneys General group, based in the Atlanta office. His practice focuses on state attorneys general and local government affairs matters.

All posts Full bio

Daniel C. Gibb

About Daniel C. Gibb

Dan is a member of Dentons' Public Policy practice and State Attorneys General group. In addition to advising business and commercial clients on legislative and public policy issues affecting their industries, he provides guidance to companies facing Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or state attorney general investigations. Dan also provides legal and strategic advice on a wide variety of consumer protection issues, including advertising law, unfair and deceptive trade practices and data privacy laws.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Dentons 50
  • State Attorneys General

Trump names picks for AG, CIA, National Security Advisor

By James Richardson
  • State Attorneys General

State AGs Tackle COVID-19 Related Issues: Some Companies Likely to Face Investigation

By Thurbert Baker, Bill McCollum, and Daniel C. Gibb
  • Dentons 50
  • State Attorneys General

CT AG leads states in support of feds’ CFPB

By James Richardson

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Categories

  • Federal Government Affairs
  • Health Care Policies
  • Policy Analysis
  • California
  • Dentons 50
  • Colorado
  • Georgia
  • Hawai`i
  • Iowa
  • Pennsylvania
  • State Attorneys General
  • Local Government Solutions
  • Elections
  • Crypto Currents
  • General
  • Policy Priorities
  • Trump Transition Tracker
Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site